Peace, Accountability and Leadership PAC (PALPAC)
Institute for Middle East Understanding
American Priorities
Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption PAC

There are currently no prominent candidates running for public office in Alabama with platforms defined by anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic rhetoric. Alabama's political landscape generally exhibits strong bipartisan support for Israel, with leading contenders actively courting endorsements from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

While fringe or extreme candidates have occasionally surfaced in past Alabama elections—such as former Public Service Commission candidate Jim Bonner, who was censured and rejected by the Alabama Republican Party for offensive social media comments—no such figures are running competitive or recognized campaigns on these platforms in the current cycle. [1]

There is no major or established candidate running for statewide public office in Alaska who explicitly identifies as anti-Zionist or antisemitic, nor is there any current, credible evidence linking the state's main congressional and gubernatorial candidates to such platforms. [1, 2, 3]

The prominent candidates running in Alaska's top congressional and state races include the following:

U.S. House

• Nick Begich (Republican - Incumbent): Endorsed by the Republican Jewish Coalition.
• Matthew Schultz (Democrat): A pastor at Anchorage's First Presbyterian Church.
• John Brendan Williams (Democrat).
• Bill Hill (Nonpartisan).
• Matthew "Bronco" Williams (Undeclared). [1, 2, 3, 4]

U.S. Senate

• Dan Sullivan (Republican - Incumbent): A steadfast proponent of the U.S.-Israel alliance and hawkish foreign policy.
• Mary Peltola (Democrat): The former U.S. Representative. [1, 2, 3]

Governor

Alaska's open race includes 16 primary candidates running for the governorship, including former state legislators Tom Begich and Click Bishop, and former Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson. None of these top-tier candidates campaign on an anti-Israel or antisemitic platform

Note: While there is no organized anti-Israel or antisemitic political movement among the recognized candidates, the divisive national rhetoric surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict occasionally surfaces in localized school board races. For instance, in an April 2026 Anchorage school board race, an independent candidate faced intense public scrutiny after sharing a social media post of Adolf Hitler. However, this individual is not a recognized candidate for state-level or congressional office. [1]

For up-to-date tracking of candidate platforms and disclosures throughout the election cycle, you can monitor the Alaska Division of Elections portal.

Determining if a candidate is "anti-Israel," "anti-Zionist," or "antisemitic" often depends on how different groups and voters interpret their rhetoric, as these terms are highly contested and sometimes conflated in political discourse. [1, 2]

Here are a few figures and races where these issues have been central in Arizona:

• Adelita Grijalva (Democrat, AZ-7): Running to fill a U.S. House vacancy, Grijalva has faced scrutiny from pro-Israel groups. Her campaign received endorsements from progressive organizations like the Progressive Democrats of America, which calls for an immediate end to military shipments to Israel.
• Crystal Carroll (Independent, Scottsdale City Council): Carroll recently deleted a series of social media posts before running for office. Critics, including members of the Scottsdale City Council, accused her of sharing antisemitic tropes and claims about Israel, though Carroll has strongly rejected the accusations.
• Republican Figures (Various Offices): Several high-profile Arizona Republicans—such as U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake, Rep. Paul Gosar, and State Sen. Wendy Rogers—have drawn condemnation from Jewish and civil rights organizations. These accusations largely stem from their associations with or endorsements from right-wing figures, such as Nick Fuentes and Andrew Torba, who have promoted antisemitic ideologies. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

To evaluate a specific candidate's platform or track record for yourself, you can review the candidate endorsements from the Jewish Democratic Council of America and track campaign contributions related to the pro-Israel lobby via Track AIPAC. [1, 2]

No major candidates running for public office in Arkansas have built their platform on anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic positions, and there is no record of such candidates in the 2026 election cycle. Arkansas is a politically conservative state with strict anti-Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) laws that bar the state from doing business with entities that boycott Israel. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Statewide candidates for the 2026 cycle include: [1]

• U.S. Senate: Republican incumbent Tom Cotton and Democratic challenger Hallie Shoffner.
• Governor: Republican incumbent Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Democratic nominee Fredrick Love, and independent Colt Shelby. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Neither of the major political parties in Arkansas has endorsed candidates platforming on these issues, and state law penalizes opposition to Israel regarding public contracts.

Several candidates running for public office in Colorado have drawn significant controversy for making anti-Israel or anti-Zionist statements, while others have been explicitly accused of promoting antisemitism: [1, 2]

• Joe Oltmann (Republican Candidate for Governor): Oltmann has sparked outrage and widespread condemnation from Jewish organizations after making inflammatory statements, including claims that Colorado and the world are controlled by a "Synagogue of Satan".
• Shana Kiros (Colorado State Senate Candidate): A far-left candidate challenging Sen. John Hickenlooper, Kiros has made an arms embargo on Israel a primary campaign talking point, has described the war in Gaza as a genocide, and has called Israel an apartheid state.
• State Senator Julie Gonzales (Colorado State Senate Candidate): Also challenging Hickenlooper, Gonzales has faced scrutiny and criticism for echoing nationwide anti-Israel trends and aligning with left-wing movements hostile to Zionism.
• Previous Candidates (Past Contests): In recent state house and regional board races, figures like Rep. Tim Hernandez and Elisabeth Epps drew backlash from advocacy groups over their public commentary, with groups like StopAntisemitism criticizing Epps over past social media posts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

These issues have heavily scrambled state politics, resulting in deep ideological divides within the Colorado Democratic Party as progressive organizers frequently push for stances critical of Israeli government policy.

While there is no comprehensive or officially curated registry of candidates based on ideological viewpoints like anti-Zionism, Connecticut’s active electoral cycle features dynamic races across both municipal and state levels. [1, 2]

Voters evaluating candidates’ stances on Israel or Jewish representation can look to recent political developments for context:

• Political Repercussions in Stamford: In a recent local election cycle, Stamford State Representative Anabel Figueroa was widely condemned by state and local leadership—and subsequently ousted from the Democratic City Committee—after making comments widely criticized as antisemitic regarding her Jewish opponent, Jonathan Jacobson. Figueroa lost her subsequent primary bid.
• National Rhetoric and Local Campaigns: While overt antisemitism is generally condemned, candidates' definitions of Zionism often spark debate. Mainstream political discourse in Connecticut has occasionally seen tension, but local and national watchdogs like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)remain vigilant in flagging inflammatory rhetoric.
• Navigating the Issue: Candidates are increasingly pressed by constituents and advocacy groups to clarify their positions on the U.S.-Israel alliance and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Voters typically assess a candidate's record by reviewing their official campaign websites, checking local endorsements, and monitoring discussions on platforms like the Connecticut Mirror to evaluate their specific positions.

There are no major mainstream candidates running for public office in Delaware with explicitly anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic platforms. Both major political parties generally support the U.S.-Israel relationship and oppose antisemitism. [1, 2, 3]

Notable details regarding candidates in the current election cycle:

• U.S. House & Senate: Mainstream candidates, including Democratic Senator Chris Coons and Congresswoman Sarah McBride, are recognized for their pro-Israel advocacy and stance against antisemitism.
• Statewide Elections: Gubernatorial and local candidates in the current cycle, such as Matt Meyer, have actively campaigned on supporting the Jewish community and condemning hate.
• Past Extremist Figures: The only recent Delaware political figure with known anti-Zionist and antisemitic views was far-right activist Lauren Witzke, who was the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in 2020 but is not running for public office in this cycle. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Voters can review the entire roster of certified candidates across the state using the official Delaware Department of Elections Candidate List.

James Fishback, a 31-year-old Republican candidate for Florida governor, has drawn significant national and local attention for his anti-Israel platform and alleged use of antisemitic rhetoric. While remaining a long-shot in the primary, his campaign has gained traction among young Republican voters. [1, 2]

• Stance on Israel: Fishback has repeatedly referred to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "war criminal" and declared that Netanyahu is "not welcome in Florida". He has also pledged to pull state investments from Israel and redirect the funds toward domestic housing programs in Florida.
• Controversial Rhetoric: He has been heavily criticized by both political rivals and Jewish organizations for his rhetoric. Critics have accused him of using antisemitic tropes, invoking "alt-right" jargon, and making incendiary remarks about the Western Wall.
• Voter Base: Although he is an underdog in the broader primary field, Fishback has built a surprisingly strong base of support among younger Republican voters in the state. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

James Fishback (Republican, Governor)

Platform & Stances: Fishback has campaigned on an "America First" platform that includes a pledge to divest the state of $385 million in Israel Bonds on his first day in office and redirect the money to domestic housing assistance. He has also explicitly stated that he will not accept campaign funding from AIPAC.

Antisemitism Allegations: Fishback has faced severe backlash for disparaging remarks about the Western Wall, publicly stating he would not visit Israel, and utilizing rhetoric associated with the far-right "Groyper" movement. Critics and Jewish organizations have sharply condemned his platform as antisemitic. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Dan Bilzerian (Republican, U.S. Congress)

Stance: Running for a U.S. House seat in Florida, the social media personality and dual U.S.-Armenian citizen has been embroiled in ongoing controversies surrounding antisemitism.

Background: He was prominently ranked by Israel's Diaspora Ministry as a top antisemitic influencer and has been criticized for inflammatory remarks about Israel and Jewish individuals. [1, 2]

Note: In 2026, Florida maintains strict state laws targeting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which mandate that the state divest from companies and entities that boycott Israel. Consequently, state-level candidates campaigning on anti-Israel mandates directly conflict with existing Florida statute

Aaron Baker (www.aaron4ga.com), Ruwa Romman (www.ruwaforgeorgia.com).

Several candidates in Georgia have faced criticism over their stances on Israel, though allegations of anti-Zionism, anti-Israel bias, or antisemitism are highly debated topics in the state's political climate. [1, 2]

Notable examples include:

• Aaron Baker: Running in the Democratic primary for State House District 51, Baker—a member of the Democratic Socialists of America—drew significant criticism from the incumbent over the DSA's platform regarding Israel.
• Ruwa Romman: A Palestinian-American State Representative who made headlines during the 2024 Democratic National Convention. Her vocal advocacy for Palestinians and criticism of Israeli military actions have generated significant debate, leading to both praise from progressive groups and intense criticism from pro-Israel advocates. She transitioned from a gubernatorial run to campaigning for the State Senate.
• Contrasting Allegations: Accusations of associations with antisemitism have also been leveraged against mainstream candidates. In past election cycles, figures across the political spectrum—including U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff, and former U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene—have faced varying levels of backlash or allegations concerning their rhetoric, policy votes, or political associations regarding Israel and the Jewish community. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The dividing line between legitimate political dissent, anti-Zionism, and antisemitism remains a sharp point of contention in Georgia elections.

There are no official or major candidates running for public office in Hawaii who have built their campaigns around or explicitly advocate for anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic platforms.

Elections are administered by the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the complete list of registered candidates for the primary and general elections is available through the Hawaii Candidate Reports.

While local election data does not reveal organized campaigns promoting these ideologies, it is possible for individual candidates to hold diverse personal viewpoints regarding international affairs. To view specific candidate financial disclosures and registered campaigns, you can utilize the Campaign Spending Commission. [1]

There are no major candidates running for public office in Idaho with an established platform of antisemitism.

However, Idaho’s political landscape has seen varying levels of discourse regarding Zionism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which occasionally intersects with local elections:

• State Leadership Stances: In late 2025, Idaho House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel (D) faced pushback and calls for resignation from some in her own party after participating in an Israeli-sponsored trip alongside several Republican lawmakers. The trip aimed to encourage state-level legislation penalizing boycotts against Israel.
• Fringe Extremism: While not running in the current cycle, Idaho has occasionally attracted fringe candidates with histories of antisemitic or white supremacist views—such as Patrick Little's 2019 run for the Garden City City Council and past associations of state figures with extremist figures at conferences. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

For official candidate profiles and disclosures regarding current campaigns across the state, visit the VoteIdaho.Gov database.

Yes, several candidates running for public office in Illinois during recent primary cycles were highly critical of Israel or identified with the anti-Zionist movement. However, as of the 2026 primary elections, many candidates who explicitly campaigned on anti-Israel platforms or against unconditional U.S. military aid to Israel were defeated. [1]

Notable political figures and candidates in the state regarding this issue include:

Defeated or Unsuccessful Candidates (2026 Primaries) Several prominent progressive candidates who received endorsements from the Democratic Socialists of America or campaigned on explicitly anti-Israel platforms—such as describing the war in Gaza as a genocide and calling for arms embargoes—failed to secure the Democratic nominations. [1, 2]

• Kat Abughazaleh: A Palestinian-American candidate and progressive influencer who ran for the U.S. House in the 9th District. She made opposition to U.S. weapons sales to Israel a central pillar of her campaign and ultimately lost the primary to Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss.
• Kina Collins: A progressive challenger for the U.S. House in the 7th District who called the conflict a genocide. She finished well behind the eventual winner, State Rep. La Shawn Ford.
• Other Candidates: Similar progressive challengers in other districts—such as Junaid Ahmed, Yasmeen Bankole, Robert Peters, and Bushra Amiwala—who voiced hostility toward U.S.-Israel relations or the pro-Israel lobby, all lost their primary races. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Candidates with Critical Positions on Israel While distinct from antisemitism, several mainstream candidates currently serving or running for office in Illinois have taken positions critical of the Israeli government, which has sparked sharp debate:

• Daniel Biss: The Mayor of Evanston and a Democrat who won the March 2026 primary for the 9th Congressional District, is a self-proclaimed Zionist but has openly positioned himself as a vocal critic of the Israeli government's policies. [1]

Note: While anti-Zionism and strident criticism of Israel are major points of political contention in Illinois—especially in heavily contested Chicago-area Democratic primaries—no major political candidate running for public office actively campaigns on an overtly antisemitic platform.

Yes, there have been a few instances of candidates associated with antisemitic or anti-Zionist platforms drawing attention in recent Indiana elections: [1, 2, 3]

• Antisemitism: In the 2026 election cycle, a candidate named Richard Benedict Mayers filed to run for U.S. Representative in Indiana's 1st Congressional District using the Nazi salute "Sieg Heil" in his official ballot name. The Lake County Republican Party actively condemned the filing and successfully pursued legal and administrative actions to remove him from the ballot.
• Anti-Zionism: In Indiana's 5th Congressional District, Jackson Franklin ran a grassroots congressional campaign explicitly campaigning on an anti-Zionist platform and calling for a halt to U.S. aid to Israel.
• Prior Cycles: In the 2024 Republican primary for the 8th Congressional District, former Representative John Hostettler ran for office and faced intense opposition from pro-Israel groups, including the Republican Jewish Coalition, which actively campaigned against him over past remarks and voting records concerning Israel that the groups deemed antisemitic and "anti-Israel". Hostettler lost that primary to Mark Messmer. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

You can track registered candidates for ongoing and upcoming elections using the Indiana Secretary of State Candidate Information portal. [1]

There are currently no major political candidates running for public office in Iowa who are explicitly campaigning on an antisemitic, anti-Zionist, or anti-Israel platform. The major candidates in both parties express strong support for Israel, with both state-level and federal campaigns generally centering on traditional domestic policy issues rather than foreign policy. [1, 2, 3]

The state’s political landscape regarding this issue is outlined below:

Major U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Candidates

• U.S. Senate Race: Both primary campaigns largely advocate for unconditional support of the U.S.-Israel alliance. Incumbent Republicans (such as Ashley Hinson) and Democratic candidates (such as Zach Wahls and Josh Turek) have either publicly supported or backed resolutions reaffirming Israel’s security, with any disagreements usually centering on the mechanics of foreign aid rather than opposition to Israel's right to exist.
• Gubernatorial Race: Incumbent Republican Kim Reynolds has championed efforts to codify executive orders condemning antisemitism in educational institutions, while the Democratic field (including candidates like Auditor Rob Sand) is not running on platforms opposing Zionism or the state of Israel.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

State Legislative and Local Races

While public political discourse has occasionally touched on Middle East policy—such as debates in the Iowa Statehouse regarding conditional aid resolutions and tracking incidents of antisemitism in schools—there are no candidates for the state legislature or prominent municipal offices who have built platforms around anti-Zionist, anti-Israel, or antisemitic ideologies. [1, 2]

For the most granular, day-to-day updates on local candidate filings, you can track registered campaigns via the Iowa Secretary of State Candidate List.

There are no major mainstream candidates running for public office in Kansas in 2026 who are explicitly campaigning on an anti-Israel or anti-Zionist platform. The state's political establishment is generally supportive of Israel, with the Kansas Legislature recently adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism into state statute. [1, 2]

While no primary campaigns are built on anti-Israel platforms, some local political figures have recently faced scrutiny regarding rhetoric they’ve used: [1]

• Pat Proctor: A Republican state representative running for Kansas Secretary of State faced criticism from Democratic lawmakers who accused him of using antisemitic dog whistles and tropes when discussing billionaire philanthropist George Soros. Proctor strongly defended his critique and rejected the assertions that his statements were prejudicial.
• Noah Taylor: A Democratic candidate running for U.S. Senate from Kechi, Kansas, has campaigned on an "end forever wars" platform and has been publicly critical of U.S. involvement in the Middle East. [1, 2]

The broader political landscape heavily leans toward pro-Israel stances, with incumbents like Rep. Sharice Davids (D-3rd District) and statewide leaders like Senate President Ty Masterson actively involved in legislative efforts to combat antisemitism and maintain ties with Israel. [1, 2]

Note: For the latest declarations, candidate statements, or any changes to filing deadlines, you can check the Kansas Secretary of State or Ballotpedia's Kansas Elections Page. [1]

There are no major mainstream candidates explicitly campaigning on anti-Zionist or antisemitic platforms in Kentucky's current. However, the issue was prominent in the state's recent primary elections. [1, 2, 3, 4]

• U.S. House District 4: Incumbent Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, who was considered the most prominent critic of U.S. military aid to Israel and voted against a resolution affirming Israel's right to exist, lost his primary on May 19 to Ed Gallrein. Gallrein was endorsed by Donald Trump and backed by pro-Israel PACs. The primary race gained national attention and drew condemnations over campaign advertising that watchdogs criticized as utilizing antisemitic tropes.
• Statewide and Local Races: Mainstream candidates, including the nominees in the 2026 U.S. Senate race—Republican Andy Barr and Democrat Charles Booker—are not running on anti-Zionist or antisemitic platforms. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

For a full list of certified candidates running for state and federal offices in Kentucky, you can check the Kentucky State Board of Elections and Ballotpedia's Kentucky Elections pages.

Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate running for the U.S. Senate in Maine, has drawn significant public scrutiny over allegations of antisemitism and anti-Zionism. [1, 2]

• The Candidate: Graham Platner, an Iraq and Afghanistan War veteran and oyster farmer, emerged as the presumptive Democratic nominee after Maine Governor Janet Mills suspended her primary campaign.
• Anti-Israel Stance: Platner's platform heavily features opposition to Israel, making opposition to AIPAC and accusations of "genocide" in Gaza central to his campaign and fundraising messaging. He has pledged to vote against further military aid to Israel.
• Antisemitism Allegations: Platner has faced fierce backlash from major Jewish groups, including the Anti-Defamation League and Jewish Democratic Council of America, due to a tattoo on his shoulder that critics and Jewish leaders have identified as a Nazi symbol, which Platner has since covered up. He has also faced criticism over past controversial social media posts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

No other prominent candidates in Maine's 2026 elections for the U.S. House or the state's gubernatorial races are currently campaigning on explicitly anti-Zionist or antisemitic platforms.

There are no candidates in Maryland running on explicitly antisemitic platforms. However, the 2026 election cycle features candidates with starkly different stances on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has fueled intense local debate regarding the boundary between anti-Zionist policies and antisemitism. [1, 2]

The following candidates have attracted notable attention or drawn criticism from Jewish community organizations over their Middle East policy stances:

• Josie Caballero (Candidate for Montgomery County Council, At-Large): Endorsed by the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Caballero pledged in a voter questionnaire to support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement and end county funding tied to Israel. Her stances—which include not engaging with Zionist groups and opposing the IHRA definition of antisemitism—have sparked petitions from local activists seeking to revoke her teachers union (MCEA) endorsement.
• Will Jawando (Candidate for Montgomery County Executive): While firmly denouncing antisemitic hate crimes, Jawando has faced criticism from pro-Israel advocates for calling for a ceasefire shortly after the October 7 attacks, citing Hamas-related data, and scrutinizing funding for the Maryland Israel Development Center.
• Amar Makunda (Candidate for Maryland State Senate, District 39): Makunda has been vocal in his criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct in Gaza, leading to pushback from organizations like the JCRC for a perceived lack of reciprocal condemnation regarding Hamas's October 7 attacks. [1, 2, 4]

Most mainstream candidates in Maryland, including prominent figures like Senator Angela Alsobrooks and former Governor Larry Hogan, maintain pro-Israel records and have condemned rising antisemitism across the state, though the former has occasionally faced scrutiny from pro-Israel organizations for supporting humanitarian-focused arms restrictions. For the latest candidate questionnaires and detailed voter guides, you can refer to the Maryland State Board of Elections or the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington. [1, 2, 3]

While antisemitism and anti-Zionism are highly sensitive topics in Massachusetts politics, there are no mainstream candidates running for major public office in the state who openly identify as antisemitic. [1, 2]

The political landscape is shaped by the following nuances:

• Anti-Zionism vs. Criticism of Israel: Several progressive and left-wing candidates—particularly in local and congressional races—have faced intense scrutiny and criticism from pro-Israel organizations for their vocal support of Palestinian rights. While critics often characterize these stances as anti-Zionist or effectively anti-Israel, the candidates themselves typically frame their positions as opposition to the policies of the Israeli government rather than hostility toward Jewish people.
• Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) Movement: Candidates who support the BDS movement (or related municipal boycotts) are frequently labeled by pro-Israel groups as anti-Zionist. For example, in Somerville, a local ballot measure regarding boycotts generated fierce debate over whether these tactics target the Jewish state or cross into bigotry.
• Mainstream Political Stances: Established Massachusetts politicians—such as U.S. Senator Ed Markey and Representative Seth Moulton—have navigated this landscape by attempting to balance support for Israel with critiques of right-wing Israeli governance, sometimes leading to the rejection of PAC money from pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

In Massachusetts elections, navigating the definitions and boundaries of legitimate foreign policy debate versus antisemitic rhetoric remains a highly contested issue. [1, 2]

Michigan's current political landscape features several candidates who are fierce critics of Israel and Zionism, with some explicitly linked to antisemitic controversies. The most notable examples are at the state and federal levels: [1, 2, 3, 4]

• Abdul El-Sayed (U.S. Senate): A Democratic candidate fiercely critical of Israel and the lobbying group AIPAC. He has faced significant backlash from Jewish leaders and opponents for campaigning alongside controversial internet streamer Hasan Piker, who has been accused of using antisemitic rhetoric. El-Sayed has also characterized the Israeli government as "evil".
• Amir Makled (University of Michigan Board of Regents): A civil rights attorney backed by the Michigan Democratic Party. Makled is a vocal pro-Palestinian advocate who supports the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. He faced intense scrutiny and lost several labor union endorsements after resurfaced social media posts revealed he had retweeted content that praised Hezbollah and contained antisemitic slurs. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

For more details on candidates' backgrounds and statements, you can track the Detroit Free Press or the Jewish News for ongoing campaign coverage. [1]

Voters and civil rights organizations have raised concerns about several Minnesota political candidates regarding allegations of antisemitism, anti-Zionism, or intense criticism of Israel across the political spectrum.[1, 2, 3]

Prominent candidates and figures involved in recent state controversies include:

• Royce White: The Republican-endorsed candidate for the U.S. Senate. Critics and the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas (JCRC) have strongly condemned White for his rhetoric, which includes employing "Jewish lobby" tropes, calling Israel the "lynchpin of the New World Order," and previously describing himself as an antisemite.
• Omar Fateh: A progressive Minnesota state senator who ran for Mayor of Minneapolis. Fateh campaigned on an anti-Zionist platform, actively boycotted "Zionist lobby groups," and faced scrutiny for his staffers' social media posts that celebrated the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks and called for Israel's dismantling. Fateh ultimately lost to incumbent Jacob Frey in the Minneapolis mayoral election.
• Rep. Ilhan Omar: Representing Minnesota's 5th Congressional District, Omar is recognized as one of Israel's harshest critics in Congress. Her use of specific language regarding Israeli political influence has drawn accusations of antisemitism from both sides of the aisle.
• Delegate Rhetoric: During the 2026 nominating conventions for the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party, federal candidates like Rep. Angie Craig called for formal investigations into alleged antisemitic activity by convention delegates, including violent threats and the use of slurs regarding Jewish money. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]

No major candidates running for public office in Mississippi—including those for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives—are running on anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic platforms. Mississippi's major state and federal elections feature mainstream candidates, and localized groups have not flagged any of the current nominees as harboring such views. [1, 2, 3]

You can view the full, localized lists of candidates certified for the November general ballot using the Mississippi Secretary of State Candidate Qualifying List.

Whether a candidate is considered "anti-Israel," "anti-Zionist," or "antisemitic" is often a matter of intense political debate. Several candidates running in Missouri's elections face these specific accusations: [1, 2]

• Rep. Cori Bush: Running in the Democratic primary for Missouri's 1st Congressional District. She is a former member of "The Squad" in the U.S. House and a vocal critic of Israel's military actions in Gaza, supporting "Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions" (BDS) initiatives. Pro-Israel groups and opponents characterize her positions as anti-Israel and damaging to the Jewish community.
• Hartzell Gray: A progressive candidate running for U.S. Congress in Kansas City's 5th District. He has been heavily criticized by pro-Israel organizations for statements he made accusing the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) of attempting to "buy him off".
• Past Candidates: Former State Representative Sarah Unsicker and perennial candidate Darrell Leon McClanahan III have both run for public office in Missouri recently while facing documented controversies—Unsicker for promoting antisemitic conspiracy theories and McClanahan for known white supremacist affiliations and antisemitic ideology. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Note: The primary election is scheduled for August 4, 2026, with candidate filings having closed on March 31, 2026. [1]

There are no major candidates running for public office in Montana who explicitly campaign on an antisemitic, anti-Zionist, or anti-Israel platform. While the definitions of these terms are frequently debated in political discourse, no active contenders for the 2026 state or federal elections are running on or promoting these platforms. [1, 2]

Federal Candidates (2026 Elections)

• U.S. Senate: The major candidates in the 2026 race include Republicans Kurt Alme and Lee Calhoun, Democrats Alani Bankhead, Michael Black Wolf, Michael Hummert, Christopher Kehoe, and Reilly Neill, along with Libertarian and Independent options. None of these contenders have campaigned on an anti-Israel or antisemitic platform.
• U.S. House: The candidates running for Montana's congressional districts feature major party contenders including Republicans like Troy Downing, Democrats like Ryan Busse and Sam Forstag, and third-party candidates. They have largely focused their platforms on standard domestic priorities, with some Democratic candidates historically expressing support for a ceasefire in Gaza. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Statewide Context Montana’s elected leaders across the political spectrum have historically condemned antisemitism and anti-Israel harassment. In recent state legislative cycles, some candidates and campaign staff have faced local scrutiny from Jewish leaders over social media activity, controversial campaign rhetoric, and antisemitic tropes. However, none of these individuals are central, declared candidates running on those specific ideological platforms in the current election cycle. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

No candidate running for public office in Nebraska identifies as antisemitic, as antisemitism is universally condemned by candidates across the political spectrum. However, in the 2026 elections, some candidates and their inner circles have faced accusations regarding their stances on Israel and Zionism. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Specific instances and figures involved in these discussions include:

• Melanie Williams (Democrat, U.S. House, NE-02): A Democratic candidate for the Omaha-area congressional seat. She has explicitly criticized U.S. policy for funding the ongoing military campaign in Gaza and is one of the candidates who has sought to reject mainstream pro-Israel funding and organizational support.
• Dan Osborn (Independent, U.S. Senate): A Democratic-aligned Independent running for the U.S. Senate. His campaign previously drew scrutiny and condemnation from some pro-Israel advocates after accepting and touting an endorsement from a progressive anti-Israel political action committee. In response, Osborn publicly stated he stands against antisemitism and supports Israel's security.
• Scott Petersen (Republican, Secretary of State): A candidate for Nebraska Secretary of State. He faced criticism from incumbent Congressman Don Bacon (R-NE), who publicly accused individuals in Petersen’s "inner circle" of making antisemitic social media posts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Voter guides and additional context regarding candidates' positions on these matters are available through the Jewish Federation of Omaha or general coverage from the Nebraska Examiner.

Yes, there are candidates running for public office in Nevada whose campaigns have drawn scrutiny for anti-Israel and antisemitic positions: [1, 2]

• Rick Shepherd (R - NV Congressional District 2): A Republican candidate for Nevada's 2nd Congressional District, Shepherd explicitly identifies as anti-Zionist and has publicly stated that "Israel is a cancer on the planet." He is running on a platform that opposes U.S. aid to Israel and seeks to replace "career politicians who serve foreign lobbies."
• Dr. James Lally (D - NV Congressional District 3): A Democratic candidate for Nevada's 3rd Congressional District, Lally is running on a platform critical of Israeli actions in Gaza and has stated he rejects campaign support from AIPAC and allied pro-Israel groups. [1, 2, 3]

Additional Context: In Nevada's 3rd Congressional District, Republican candidate Marty O'Donnell—endorsed by Donald Trump—also recently faced controversy after it was reported he hosted a popular far-right and neo-Nazi influencer on his podcast. [1]

Disclaimer: Major candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties in Nevada—such as Senator Jacky Rosen, who is Jewish, and Senate challenger Sam Brown in previous cycles—have consistently maintained strong pro-Israel platforms. [1, 2]

Yes, the 2026 election cycle in New Hampshire features candidates and officeholders whose statements and actions regarding Israel, Zionism, and the Jewish community have drawn significant public scrutiny. The following individuals have been the subject of controversy: [1, 2, 3]

Congressional Candidates

• Heath Howard: A Gen Z Democratic candidate for Congress in New Hampshire's 1st District, Howard drew significant national criticism after he refused to affirm Israel's right to exist in a television interview. He has also faced backlash for equating the Israeli state with Hamas terrorists and calling for an arms embargo on Israel.
• Karishma Manzur: A progressive Democrat running for the U.S. Senate, Manzur is an outspoken opponent of Israel's military actions in Gaza and actively campaigns alongside pro-Palestinian activists on a platform of withholding U.S. military aid. [1, 2, 3, 4]

State Legislators

• Rep. Travis Corcoran: A Republican member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, Corcoran drew widespread condemnation from both sides of the aisle in March 2026 after posting on social media, "We need a final solution for theater kids in politics". The phrase "final solution" is universally recognized as referencing the Nazi Holocaust.
• Rep. Matt Sabourin dit Choinière: A Republican member of the New Hampshire House, he proposed an amendment in January 2026 that sought to add a known German Holocaust denier to the state’s Holocaust and Genocide Education Commission. This action prompted outrage from Jewish leaders, though his legislative amendment ultimately failed. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Voters across the political spectrum have expressed concern over these candidates and controversies, though the definition of what constitutes antisemitism or anti-Zionism continues to be a subject of intense debate in New Hampshire political discourse. [1, 2, 3]

While there are no major New Jersey candidates running on an explicitly antisemitic platform, several have drawn significant controversy and accusations of antisemitism due to their strong criticisms of Israel. The primary areas of contention involve the following candidates: [1, 2, 3]

• Analilia Mejia: Running for the U.S. House in the deep-blue 11th Congressional District, Mejia won an April 2026 special election to finish out the term of Gov. Mikie Sherrill and is running for the full term. She has faced intense criticism from political opponents and advocacy groups for stating she believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and for not raising her hand at a candidate forum when asked if Jewish people have a right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. Mejia rejects the "antisemitic" label and has since earned the endorsement of the liberal pro-Israel group J Street PAC, which commended her shared commitment to fighting antisemitism.
• Brian Varela: Running in the Democratic primary for the U.S. House in New Jersey's 7th Congressional District, Varela has drawn fire from some political circles for picking up endorsements from anti-Israel advocacy groups like A New Policy and CAIR.
• Mussab Ali: A former Jersey City Board of Education president running for the U.S. House in the 10th Congressional District, Ali has faced heavy pushback from pro-Israel advocates and Jewish leaders for his vocal criticisms of the Jewish state, where he has used terms like genocide and apartheid to describe Israel's actions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ‘’—“”, 7, 8]

Voters concerned with candidates' specific positions on the Middle East and antisemitism can track and review individual campaign statements through Insider NJ or the nonpartisan New Jersey Globe.

Several candidates running for or currently holding public office in New York—particularly within the progressive and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) movements—face fierce criticism for their anti-Israel and anti-Zionist platforms, which many advocacy groups, including the ADL and prominent Jewish organizations, equate with antisemitism. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Prominent figures who have drawn controversy include:

• Zohran Mamdani: The current Mayor of New York City, he previously served in the NY State Assembly. Mamdani identifies as an anti-Zionist and has faced deep scrutiny from Jewish communities for his anti-Israel policies, opposition to the existence of Israel as a Jewish state, and his handling of Middle East protests. While his platform includes strong commitments to combating domestic antisemitism and funding hate crime prevention, critics point to his activism as legitimizing anti-Jewish hatred.
• Claire Valdez: A New York State Assemblymember and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) candidate running for Congress in New York's 7th District. She has organized heavily for pro-Palestinian causes and drawn support from controversial anti-Israel activists, prompting concern from pro-Israel groups regarding her stance on Middle East conflicts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

The question of what constitutes anti-Zionism versus antisemitism remains a highly debated topic in New York politics, particularly within the Democratic party. You can explore candidate platforms and reactions from local watchdog groups via the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) or American Jewish Committee (AJC). [1, 2, 3, 4]

There are currently no known anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic candidates running for public office in North Dakota. The state’s political landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by Republicans who maintain strong pro-Israel platforms. [1, 2]

Current Political Landscape

• Statewide & Federal: North Dakota has a firmly Republican government trifecta. Major candidates from both the Republican and Democratic-NPL (Nonpartisan League) parties generally express strong support for U.S.-Israel relations.
• Anti-BDS Legislation: North Dakota enacted legislation countering the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, which prohibits the state from contracting with or investing in companies that boycott the country. [1, 2, 3, 4]

For up-to-date candidate lists and filings, you can check the official North Dakota Secretary of State Candidate List. To review further details on candidates’ specific ideological or foreign policy stances, you can visit Ballotpedia's North Dakota Elections Page.

Several candidates for public office in Ohio have recently faced criticism, backlash, or public scrutiny for rhetoric, social media posts, or AI-generated content deemed anti-Israel or antisemitic: [1, 2, 3]

• Nicole Sigurdson: The Cuyahoga County Democratic Party's endorsed candidate for Ohio House District 19 issued an apology after facing heavy backlash from the Jewish community and fellow party members for a 2025 social media post. The deleted post featured an image of a Palestinian flag and the controversial slogan, "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free".
• Mounir Lynch: A candidate for the Columbus City Schools Board of Education. Watchdog groups like StopAntisemitism flagged him for social media posts made on October 7, 2023, that celebrated the Hamas massacre and called for an education sector "free of Zionists".
• Casey Putsch: An automotive engineer who ran for Ohio Governor in the Republican primary. He faced intense condemnation for running a campaign featuring antisemitic dogwhistles, utilizing Adolf Hitler imagery/allusions, and promoting far-right antisemitic conspiracy theories. He lost in a landslide to Vivek Ramaswamy. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Voters continue to scrutinize candidates who use anti-Zionist rhetoric—a term that some advocacy groups and lawmakers consider indistinguishable from antisemitism. [1, 2]

There are no mainstream candidates running for public office in Oklahoma with active, official platforms centered on anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic agendas. However, candidates for both major parties face localized and national scrutiny over past associations or rhetoric.

Current and recent scrutiny regarding these issues in Oklahoma includes:

• Congressional Race: Jackson Lahmeyer, an evangelical pastor and founder of "Pastors for Trump," is running for Oklahoma's 1st Congressional District. He previously received pushback for standing by Oklahoma Republican Party social media messaging that compared COVID-19 vaccine restrictions to the Holocaust.
• State Senate: Ray Woods, an independent candidate who ran for U.S. Senate in Oklahoma, previously faced public condemnation for controversial remarks regarding the LGBTQ+ community and for stating that Oklahoma is fundamentally a "Christian state".
• General Political Climate: State lawmakers have enacted legislation to explicitly prohibit the state from contracting with companies that participate in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. Furthermore, Oklahoma state law formally adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism to combat discrimination in public schools and colleges. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

You can track registered candidates and their exact campaign platforms on the Oklahoma State Election Board.

State Representative Chris Rabb won the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania's 3rd Congressional District. With no Republican challenger, he is widely expected to secure the U.S. House seat in November 2026. Rabb has campaigned as an outspoken critic of Israel, frequently accusing the nation of "genocide" and actively campaigning against traditional pro-Israel political organizations. His positions include ending U.S. military aid to Israel. [1, 2, 3]

However, Rabb and his campaigns have also faced pushback and controversy regarding accusations of crossing the line into antisemitism. [1]

• Social Media Controversy: During his congressional campaign, Rabb's official Instagram account shared a post that claimed the Bondi Beach massacre was a "Zionist" false flag. Rabb subsequently disavowed the post and blamed a former staffer for sharing it.
• National Endorsements: While his anti-Israel and anti-Zionist platforms have generated strong pushback from Jewish advocacy groups, Rabb’s progressive campaign successfully garnered endorsements from several Democratic House members. [1, 2, 3]

For more information on the candidates, you can visit the Philadelphia City Commissioners pag

There are no high-profile candidates in Rhode Island running for federal or major state offices with established platforms centered on antisemitism. However, some progressive and independent political candidates have faced public scrutiny from local Jewish groups regarding their criticism of Israel and stated opposition to Zionism. [1]

The definitions and boundaries of what constitutes anti-Zionism versus antisemitism are intensely debated in Rhode Island's political discourse. The political environment features specific tensions and groups:

• Congressional Delegation: All incumbent members of Rhode Island's federal delegation support aid for Israel, which has drawn criticism from local anti-Zionist groups like Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) Rhode Island.
• Local Municipal Politics: Activists in the state, including local JVP chapters, have pushed for municipal boycott and divestment initiatives directed at Israel, which critics argue are inherently antisemitic, while supporters maintain they are strictly political protests against Israeli government policies.
• Providence Mayoral Race: Mayor Brett Smiley's attendance at a national summit addressing antisemitism drew criticism from progressive state Representative David Morales, who called the conference a tool used by outside conservative donors to push a national agenda. [1, 2, 3]

While there are candidates in the state who are highly critical of Israel, there are no notable candidates in the 2026 election cycle in Rhode Island running on overtly antisemitic platforms. You can monitor the candidates filing for office and their official platforms using the Ballotpedia Rhode Island Elections tracker or directly via the Rhode Island Board of Elections.

There are no major party candidates on the ballot in South Carolina who explicitly run on an anti-Israel or anti-Zionist platform. However, antisemitic and anti-Israel rhetoric has surfaced among the campaign staff of candidates running for the U.S. Senate. [1]

U.S. Senate Race Controversies

• Incumbent Sen. Lindsey Graham is running for a fifth term. He publicly criticized two of his Republican primary challengers, Paul Dans and Mark Lynch, for employing senior campaign officials with histories of making antisemitic statements and anti-Israel rhetoric.
• Paul Dans and Mark Lynch (Republican primary candidates) drew scrutiny after Graham revealed their respective staffers had made troubling remarks, including explicit anti-Israel language suggesting the U.S. should drop Israel as an ally, and posts derogatory toward the Talmud. [1, 3]

Broader Political Landscape Both major parties in South Carolina publicly assert pro-Israel stances. For example, the state legislature passed a resolution to adopt an internationally recognized definition of antisemitism to combat discrimination in education and public spaces, and state lawmakers formed an SC-Israel Legislative Caucus to foster stronger ties between the state and Israel.

There are no known candidates running for public office in South Dakota who have openly campaigned on an anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic platform. The state maintains strict political alignment with Israel, with previous gubernatorial actions prohibiting state agencies from doing business with companies that boycott Israel. [1, 2]

If you would like to look into specific candidates running for the State Legislature, Governorship, or Congress, you can review the full 2026 Primary Election Candidate List certified by the South Dakota Secretary of State.

While there are no major party candidates running in Tennessee who explicitly identify as antisemitic, the broader political landscape in the state contains significant, ongoing debates over what constitutes anti-Zionism versus antisemitism, with several progressive candidates facing sharp criticism for their stances on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Prominent examples of candidates facing these specific labels or criticisms in recent Tennessee elections include:

• Aftyn Behn: A progressive state representative who ran in a high-profile 2025 special election for Tennessee's 7th Congressional District, facing intense opposition and pro-Israel pushback. During her campaign, she faced criticism from conservative groups and the Jewish community for supporting the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement and visiting an anti-Israel encampment at Vanderbilt University.
• Marie Mott: A Chattanooga City Council candidate who previously faced widespread condemnation and lost key political support after posting videos on social media that were widely condemned as containing antisemitic remarks.
• State Senator Frank Niceley: A Republican state senator who, during a 2022 congressional primary race, faced bipartisan condemnation—including from his own party and the Republican Jewish Coalition—for making remarks that were criticized as antisemitic when discussing a Jewish candidate.[1, 2, 3, 4]

The line between criticizing Israeli government policies and crossing into anti-Zionism or antisemitism is one of the most heavily debated topics in current Tennessee politics, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian advocacy groups frequently clashing over the rhetoric used by various local and national candidates. [1, 2, 3]

To track individual candidates' specific policy positions, statements, and endorsements in the current election cycle, you can monitor updates from local watchdogs like The Tennessee Holler or the Jewish Insider.

Maureen Galindo, a Democratic candidate who ran for Texas's 35th Congressional District, heavily utilized antisemitic tropes and anti-Israel rhetoric during her campaign. She ultimately lost the May 2026 primary runoff election to Johnny Garcia. [1, 2, 3]

Galindo’s primary campaign gained attention after she made a series of inflammatory comments, which resulted in widespread condemnation from both Democratic and Republican leaders, as well as Jewish organizations: [1]

• Imprisonment Threats: She stated on social media that if elected, she would convert an ICE detention center in Texas into a "prison for American Zionists".
• Antisemitic Tropes: In interviews, she repeated anti-Jewish tropes, claiming that "Zionist Jews" own the media, banking systems, and politicians. [1, 2, 3]

Galindo advanced to the May 26 primary runoff but was defeated by Johnny Garcia. Garcia is moving forward to represent the Democratic Party in the November general election. [1, 2, 3]

For more details on the election results and the bipartisan condemnation of Galindo's comments, you can read the reporting from NPR or the Associated Press. [1]

No candidates currently running for public office in Utah have been officially designated or widely recognized by major election watchdog organizations, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), as antisemitic. [1, 2]

However, the intersection of Middle East policy and elections has sparked local debates:

• Nate Blouin: A Democratic state senator who ran for Congress in Utah's 1st District faced criticism over his public monitoring of campaign donations from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Critics, including local op-ed columnists, argued these "AIPAC Trackers" echoed harmful tropes about Jewish political influence, while Blouin maintained his focus was purely on criticizing out-of-state funding. Blouin was ultimately eliminated in the April 2026 Democratic state convention.
• Grant Miller: Elected in 2024 as Utah's first Palestinian-American state lawmaker (House District 38), Miller has been an outspoken advocate for Palestinian rights. He and other progressive candidates have drawn scrutiny from pro-Israel groups for criticizing Israel's military actions and advocating for reduced U.S. aid. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Mainstream political debate in Utah has largely focused on defending the U.S.–Israel alliance versus calls for a ceasefire and conditioning aid, rather than embracing antisemitic ideologies. You can explore candidate platforms and backgrounds on the Vote Utah Candidate Portal. [1, 2, 3]

While there are no major party candidates in Vermont running on an explicitly antisemitic platform, Vermont has an active progressive movement with strong political disagreements surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This environment has generated intense debate over where sharp criticism of Israel crosses the line into anti-Zionism and antisemitism. [1, 2, 3]

The Progressive Party Stance

The Vermont Progressive Party is the only major statewide party that calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to U.S. military aid to Israel, and an end to the occupation of Palestinian territories. Its platform strongly opposes Israeli government actions in Gaza, labeling them as a military assault, with some party-aligned figures and progressive state lawmakers actively referring to the conflict as a genocide. [1, 2, 3]

The Local "Apartheid-Free" Pledges

Across the state, activists have pushed "Apartheid-Free Communities" ballot measures in towns such as Burlington, Winooski, Brattleboro, and Montpelier. These non-binding pledges urge local governments to cut ties with Israeli institutions. [1, 2, 3, 4]

• Support: Activists and some local left-leaning municipal candidates argue the pledge is a human rights issue against apartheid and not an attack on Jewish people.
• Opposition: Pro-Israel advocacy groups like the Shalom Alliance, as well as some Jewish community members, strongly oppose these candidates and measures. They argue that the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) and anti-apartheid campaigns are forms of anti-Zionism that frequently blur the line into antisemitism, making Jewish residents feel unsafe. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

State Legislative Scrutiny

State-level politicians face heavy scrutiny from both sides of the aisle, with little tolerance for overt antisemitism: [1]

• The Israel Trip: Five state representatives (three Democrats and two Republicans) faced ethics complaints from left-leaning organizations after participating in a 2025 fact-finding trip to Israel, though the Vermont House Ethics Panel dismissed the complaints.
• National Delegation: Even Vermont’s staunchly progressive Congressional delegation, including Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Peter Welch, and Representative Becca Balint, has grappled with these issues. The entire delegation has been openly critical of Israeli military actions, but they also condemn rising antisemitism, emphasizing the difficulty of navigating the political landscape of Vermont's Jewish community. [1, 2, 3, 4]

There are no notable major party candidates in Virginia's active 2026 election cycle explicitly campaigning on an antisemitic platform. However, the ongoing conflict in Gaza has made the U.S.-Israel alliance a wedge issue, with some candidates facing intense scrutiny over their criticisms of Israel and Zionism. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The most prominent recent controversies regarding this issue in Virginia involve the following figures:

• Del. Sam Rasoul (D-Roanoke): A Democratic member of the Virginia House of Delegates, Rasoul faced significant bipartisan backlash from Jewish organizations, the ADL, and top Democrats over inflammatory social media posts. His posts included calling Zionism "evil" and a "supremacist ideology". He explored a congressional run for 2026 but ultimately announced he would remain in his current legislative seat.
• Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D-Richmond): A state senator and candidate for Lieutenant Governor in recent Virginia cycles, Hashmi also drew concern from some pro-Israel groups. Her critics pointed to her vocal support for Palestinian rights and her role in calling an Education Committee hearing following pro-Palestine campus protests. However, she has vehemently denied accusations of antisemitism and maintains strong alliances with Jewish community leaders.
• Local Nominees: State and local parties have occasionally grappled with fringe candidates. For example, during a recent special election cycle, one Northern Virginia Democratic nominee faced bipartisan calls to drop out over resurfaced antisemitic and racist social media posts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

For a complete and up-to-date list of certified candidates running in upcoming races, you can check the Virginia Department of Elections Candidate Lists.

There are no major political candidates actively running for public office in Washington state whose platforms are centered on or defined by antisemitism.

However, there are candidates in Washington and at the national level whose harsh criticism of Israel and the Zionist movement has been classified by various Jewish and civil rights organizations (such as the Anti-Defamation League) as crossing into anti-Zionism or antisemitism. [1]

The political spectrum on this issue includes:

• Statewide and Congressional Candidates: Some progressive candidates in Washington (like former Democratic congressional candidate Melissa Chaudhry in the 9th District) have drawn attention for prioritizing Gaza ceasefire movements and receiving support from left-wing groups that heavily criticize Israel. Mainstream advocacy groups have occasionally alleged that the rhetoric used by these campaigns or their supporters veers into antisemitism or anti-Zionism.
• National Comparisons: Incidents of candidates explicitly tying antisemitism to their political platforms have been more prominently reported in other states. For example, Washington, D.C. mayoral candidate Janeese Lewis George faced significant backlash from Jewish leaders after pledging to not attend events that promote Zionism, an action heavily condemned by groups like the Combat Antisemitism Movement. [1, 2, 3, 4]

To research the specific backgrounds, endorsements, and documented statements of any local candidate in Washington, you can use the official Washington Secretary of State Elections Division to track candidates and their registered platforms. Furthermore, you can review candidate scorecards and analyses of campaign rhetoric regarding this issue through local civil rights watchdogs such as the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Seattle.

There are currently no major, competitive candidates running for public office in West Virginia who campaign on explicitly anti-Israel or anti-Zionist platforms. While a few fringe candidates or local political figures have previously faced backlash or controversy for making antisemitic remarks, these individuals are not considered viable contenders in the current West Virginia elections. [1, 2]

Below are the primary candidates for major federal and state offices in West Virginia: [1]

• U.S. Senate: Incumbent Republican Shelley Moore Capito is facing Democratic nominee Rachel Fetty Anderson.
• U.S. House of Representatives (District 1): Incumbent Republican Carol Miller, Democrat Vince George, and Independent Isaiah Rucker are running.
• U.S. House of Representatives (District 2): Incumbent Republican Riley Moore is challenged by Democrat Ace Parsi, Independent Patrick Carney, and Independent Christopher Whitcomb. [1, 2, 3]

For more specific information on local state legislature races, you can view the complete West Virginia Watch 2026 Voter Guide or visit the official West Virginia Secretary of State Candidate Directory to look up specific candidates in your local district.

There are no major candidates currently running for major public office in Wisconsin who have been officially identified as explicitly antisemitic. However, the 2026 campaign cycle features sharp debates over what constitutes anti-Zionism and anti-Israel policy. [1]

• Statewide Elections: Progressive figures, such as State Rep. Francesca Hong, who is running for Wisconsin Governor, opposed a new law enacted by Gov. Tony Evers that codified the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. Critics, including Hong, argued that the legislation could compromise free speech and lead to policies that treat all criticism of the Israeli government as a discriminatory offense.
• National Representation: Senator Tammy Baldwin has faced pressure and lobbying from pro-Israel groups, such as AIPAC, regarding her positions on conditioning aid to Israel and her voting record regarding the conflict in Gaza. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

While there are candidates who advocate for Palestinian rights and criticize Israeli government policy, none of the mainstream candidates for statewide or federal office are running on overtly anti-Zionist platforms. Historically, Wisconsin voters have firmly rejected candidates associated with white supremacist or extreme antisemitic ideologies, such as former Republican congressional candidate Paul Nehlen. [1, 2]

There are currently no notable candidates running for major public office in Wyoming who are classified as anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, or antisemitic. The established candidates running in the 2026 election cycle across both the U.S. Senate and U.S. House races maintain pro-Israel positions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

For the U.S. Senate, incumbent Republican Harriet Hageman has a history of strong advocacy for the U.S.-Israel alliance and has spoken out against antisemitism. She faces challengers in the Republican primary such as Jimmy Skovgard, Sam Mead, and Jill Edwards, along with Democratic candidates Billy Benavidez and James Byrd, none of whom have campaigned on anti-Zionist platforms. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

For the U.S. House At-Large race, the primary field is heavily populated by Republicans, including state officials like Chuck Gray and challengers like Reid Rasner and Bo Biteman, who strongly align with pro-Israel conservative stances. [1, 2, 3]

You can track the full list of registered candidates and their platforms on Ballotpedia or via local outlets like WyoFile.